|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BUDAPEST METRO LINE 4 FEASIBILITY STUDY Oktober 1996 |
SECTION C - ENGINEERING ISSUES |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANNEX C Section C reports the key engineering issues to be addressed to implement a metro line. Rolling Stock design, infrastructure aspects and required equipment to operate Metro line 4 are successively examined. Operation principles are summarised. This section ends with the overall capital cost estimation, in accordance with assumptions of staging alternatives. Rolling Stock designIntroductionThis chapter describes the general characteristics and performances of the rolling stock designed on the basis of the refined passenger forecasts (refer Section B). The objective of the Second Stage was to optimise the rolling stock, so as to optimise in particular the station design, while considering the appropriate level of service and level of comfort to provide to the passengers. General characteristicsRolling Stock Diagram
Only two types of vehicles are proposed to be included
within the train consist, so as to optimise the overall train
cost, as follows :
Train ConsistsA cab in the trailer allows in particular to design a train consisting of only 2 different types of vehicles, which is more economical than a train consisting of 3 or more different type of cars.
A three-phase asynchronous propulsion should allow
a slight increase of power at the axle. A power of 200 kW
per axle complies with the requirements of a reduced clearance
of the rolling stock.
Under these conditions, two types of train consists
can be designed to comply with the operation requirements and
the passenger forecasts: one consisting of 4 cars, the other comprising
5 cars. The 4 Car train set includes 2 traction units and 2 hauled vehicles is recommended.
It is more cost effective and provides a good level of service.
The 5 car train set should include 2 trailers equipped
with a driver's cab and 3 motor coaches.
Considering the two train consists, the related capacity is as follows :
Main dimensions
|
Vehicle without cab | |
Length at body ends | 15.200 m |
Length over buffers | 15.500 m |
Width | 2.600 m |
Height | 3.500 m / 3.600 m |
Height of floor | 1.040 / 1.050 m |
Vehicle with cab | |
Length at body ends | 15.800 m |
Length over buffers | 16.250 m |
Width | 2.600 m |
Height | 3.500 m / 3.600 m |
Height of floor | 1.040 / 1.050 m |
4 Car train set | |
Length at body ends | 63.060 m |
Length over buffers | 63.500 m |
5 Car train set | |
Length at body ends | 78.560 m |
Length over buffers | 79.000 m |
It should be noticed the 79 m outer length of a 5 Car train set, that will support the station design. Station platform will be designed on a standard 80 m length.
Based on a 2 mn train headway, the total capacity
supplied is between 20,100 and 24,000 passengers per hour, per
direction, (depending on the 4 or 5 standees per m² level
of comfort, under the most comfortable conditions: 152 seated
passengers per train, to compare to the expected maximal passenger
flow forecasts (Section B). If further needed, a higher level
of service corresponding to 90s train headway could be supplied,
the capacity being between 26,800 and 32,000 passengers, the technical
equipment, especially power supply being dimensioned on that assumption
(refer to Chapter C-3).
|
| |||
Capacity | ||||
5 car Train Set |
During off-peak hours, each train capacity being 272 seats, the capacity supplied is 8,160 seated passengers, for a 2 mn train headway.
The 3-side-door diagram theoretically allows for each door enough space for 3 persons in line. It is generally assumed that the boarding time or getting off time for each passenger is around 0,6 s. Under these conditions, each vehicle boarding/alighting capacity is 5.4 pax/s.
Theoretical station dwell time is generally calculated considering
one third of the passengers getting off from the most loaded vehicle
(vehicle without cab), and the same amount of passengers boarding.
Theoretical estimation gives around 20 s for a 4 pax/m² train
set and 25 for a 5 pax/m² train set.
To calculate the commercial speed on the line, the most unfavourable time is considered.
The theoretical duration of emergency evacuation is calculated according to the same criteria of passengers capacity for the most loaded vehicle. It is given to be around 26 s for a 4 pax/m² train set, 30s for a 5 pax/m² train set.
Unladen weight
It is assumed that the trailers with driver's cab are equipped with a compressor unit, a secondary battery and a DC/AC converter for the supply of control circuits and power for auxiliaries (light, heating/ventilation, battery charger, etc.). The motor coaches do not include any auxiliary group.
Weight of a Tc trailer: Mtvom = 22,000 kg,
Weight of an M motor coach: Mmvom = 28,000 kg.
The weight of a 5 car train set ready for service is as follows:
Mvom: 128,000 kg.
Rotational weight
Rotational weight is evaluated to:
M = 6,000 kg for motor coaches,
T = 1,500 kg for trailers.
Standard passenger's weight generally considered
is 70 kg.
Passenger load | Q4 = 46 900 kg | Q5 = 56 000 kg | Q8 = 72 100 kg |
Total weight | M4 = 174 900 kg | M5 = 184 000 kg | M8 = 200 100 kg |
In preliminary evaluations, the traction efforts
are assumed proportional to the vehicle load, the acceleration
remaining constant regardless of the train load. The efforts
at the wheel are due mainly to the traction motor power and to
the wheel-rail available friction at the time of the excitation,
refer to Figure C-5 below.
The maximum effort at the wheel, unladen mass, is:
Mmvom × g × adh:
The effort at the wheel with one traction power equipment damaged is:
Fjmax × 2/3 = 115,300 N
It is assumed that, starting is possible when the acceleration is equal or greater than 0.1 m/s2. The general formula of the efforts in grade is:
(Mvom + M) × 0,1 + (Mvom × g × sin) Fj
i.e.:
sin (Fj - (Mvom + M) × 0.1) / Mvom × g
sin 0.08,
which means that a 80 gradient is theoretically
feasible.
A damage on one traction power equipment is not the determining factor for the magnitude of the maximum grade on the system.
It corresponds to a damage immobilising a whole train.
In that case, after unloading of its passengers, the following
train pushes the damaged train. An empty train gives "help"
to a train loaded at 5 pax/m², for example.
The maximum gradient is:
sin 0.045,
which means that a 45 gradient is theoretically
feasible under these extreme conditions. Indeed, the maximum
grade level in line should not exceed 40.
For the 4 car train set, this type of contingency practically corresponds to a damage on motor coach equipment. The maximum grade should not exceed 40. In very exceptional cases, the gradient might reach 45.
The maximum grade is:
sin 0.053,
for an excitation to which has been applied the friction
coefficient.
It is assumed that a loaded train, suffering a single contingency, would be able, in very exceptional cases, to pass a 50 gradient.
Under a load of 8 pax/m², the static load per axle is:
11.2 t.
Under a load of 10 pax/m², the static load per axle is:
12.1 t.
Based on standard design speed and depending on the
vertical and horizontal profiles, the operating speed can reach
80 kph.
According to the alignment station spacing and the operation contingencies, the commercial speed is given to 28 kph.