Ideally: a brake should be put on those characteristics of the individual and the community which contradict immortality, those which leave free those characteristics of the individual and the community, which serve the programme of immortality. Actually, because of the amortisation, the erosion of information (information is not lost, it merely transforms) is the prey of the maffidiot (always, the maffidiots form a given micro-macro situation, because the less of a maffidiot he is, the more tolerant).

What role does the SLSP 1984 W consign to it?

Whether dictatorical or direct theocratic (or anything else in the spectrum), we are on the way to achivieving that everyone be guaranteed the Subsistance Level.

How does an ideal state decide which characteristics are contradictory to immortality, and by which devices it would put a break on the damaging ones?

With Direct Democracy.

Would you be happy to be the head of state?

In a direct democracy, there is no head of state.

Can poiesis be perceived in the car repair profession?

Will be continued